Walking With The Devil Sayings

citizen, part I

I have to wake up from this slumber. Since the last time I communicated with you have been so many fiascos in all sorts of things: Transantiago LOCE, Pass School, in anticipation, the new "quota" of parliament, etc, etc. . . Unfortunately

Chile is full of these embarrassing cases in which all participants or arguments argue bordering on stupidity or turn into the same hesitations as usual or do nothing or to combine perfectly the last three alternatives, and I am so upset that he would prefer to forget everything and live this hard time, but my conscience obliges me to this to squeeze out of my mind these words:

Lizama start with the case (it's reported comment of "Mercury")

· "I never knew I was the judge," said TVN last night, the young Jorge Lizama, 19, who must meet detention during the processing by the attack on Judge Gloria Ana Chevesich during the protest last March 29, departing the day the young "criminal."
With all the respect I have for the Minister Chevesich, I am concerned that justice work with this quickly when we see "important" people involved.

· Lizama said he was "extremely sorry" for the attack on Chevesich
And of course this puppet should be sorry, because it is quite clear that I was involved with the wrong person, and expensive it will cost.

· "I do not think that should fall to jail, that's the worst that can happen to a person. People come out worse, then do not think I serve much jail "
Unfortunately we are facing an endemic of Chileans as pilgrims astonishingly, to your surprise, there are all sorts of crimes that fall outside the collective consciousness, as buying in the street, not paying micro, keep the back, etc etc. All made by these famous "Protestant" is a crime, well deserve to go jail and compensate all the damages caused. In this sense, the prison, outside the modern concept that has play a role in rehabilitation, is a punishment, a regret, to restrain the offender.

· claims to be "libertarian, not anarchist," admitted taking part in the march La Moneda on September 10, 2006, but denied throwing a Molotov cocktail into the palace. Yes admitted stoned a fast-food restaurant in Alameda. "No, I'ma libertarian, I am not an anarchist. If it were not to be living here, would be self-managing my life." Front
dear pilgrims to these statements I feel overwhelmed, because they made against the libertarian anarchism, at least it should lead to respect the intelligence of the aforementioned and presumably has some idea of \u200b\u200bwhat he speaks. But thankfully I avoided this waste neuronal and he responds to my concerns.
This is a great example of the widespread ignorance of all these groups or tribes, as some call them. In truth is beyond my present purpose to expose the false concept of the sentence declared, but they only tell you all: anarchists!, If they manage their lives. Does this seem logical?.

• The youngest refused to be a symbol of youth violence. "I'm not, I'm being persecuted simply a chase, someone has to fall right down and I fell."
is intended or not a symbol of youth violence, it is clear that these behaviors create awareness impact on tort, generating more and more puppets in the service of the winds that stir the waters, known ideologically but masked.
On the other hand, I think our "friend" has serious delusions of persecution should see a specialist because I do not see where the authority will pursue these demonstrations. My watchful eyes, my ears are trained only standing. For centuries, pilgrims dear, it is known that the rule of law, one does not push him or below, or well below, or anything. The prior conduct is established, and therefore self is who it is imposed.

• The reason that hooding is: "Because in this system if they see you face, if you know who you are, they put you in jail. The only option is to leave hooded, not see you face. It is not cowardice, it is courage. "
This is another phrase for the gold. And unfortunately calls himself a libertarian, then live the freedom of their faces covered, freedom of reactionary violence. It gives me a fuzzy feeling between laughs and fear. The only thing I say damn cowards, is give the face!, male night, male anyday. If you are brave acts will be around, and if the consequences are bad Resist him stoically. Unfortunately in my eyes you are nothing but criminals, uneducated, violent and cowardly - bad mix .-

• Which can be achieved without actuai with violence, whether in a march peacefully actuai no you'll catch. "
Well clearly things can be achieved peacefully. But do not be fooled, since their purposes are different from those published, just apparently masked protests.

° to the damage noted: "Those who are a local shred Flaites not know anything about what they are doing, destroy local poor people. What it is justifiable, perhaps, is to break a bank, a multinational. "
Is there any substantial difference between destroying private property of humble people and great companies?, Being any causal link between two parts. active or aggressor in this case is the one who throws the stone, who destroys, who burn, the passive victim is his own destruction.
How important is perhaps if the purchasing power of A or B is different so it is easier to solve the situation?. In the morality of active is indistinct, since the fact is the same.
is only a sample of old separatist doctrines totally wrong, which promote hatred between classes.

· "Obviously yes, if I'll be in jail with criminals almost." "I'm not criminal, I'm not, the offender is violating the people involved, people that walk robbing their own people" .
Offenders are those who commit crimes, and as I said and I noted, it is criminal to Chile's only violates kills, "steals from his own people", etc, etc ... Well let me tell you contradict and in letters: CRIMINALS! ! ! !

° to the lack of his mother in his training, said he had suffered when she was ...
Without justifying the wrongful conduct is a big test because we must protect the family, an activity much vilified by the current administration.

• The Lizama remand was ordered by the Third Chamber of the Court of Appeals capital city ... Sample
the first instance it is currently suffering serious conceptual conflict on how to apply the criminal law. Due to various factors I think that involves all actors in national politics. Parliamentarians as always do not represent a real contribution, the executive unfortunate policies, justice without the means (physical and intellectual), the most appropriate institutions and prisons needed.
And you know, could go on all morning.

· "the accused, after being intercepted the car of the Minister in Paraguay with Lira Diagonal Street, and warned that it was a high government official ...
To me, again, I care that the Minister has tried and is more, I concerned, and I insist, with all the respect she deserves.
Because if it had been the order of Don Juan, Dona Maria, ordinary people or the business of Don Fulano, the shoe store or whatever Perengano of Sutan, as occurred in 99.9% of other impairments The answer, punishing criminals guilty, never came. Justice addressed, dear pilgrims, is bad for legal certainty.

· Andrés Rieutord, claimed that the youth was not acting in concert, he did not know it was the minister, and you can not detain a person "to satisfy public opinion."
Shame give according to his lawyer argued his pocket and spitting on true justice, citing as stupid and illogical.
And I venture to answer: of course public opinion in a democracy is important, or is it not their livelihood. The public must be satisfied when based on history as much weight as those that occurred, but it is not permissible to feel neglected and reveal. Les

neglect to ponder my words.
The Preacher.

give them the link to emol