All Possible Combinations Calculation

: LOCE, Preacher: no, you know nothing Unconscious

( Dedicated to students who have destroyed and looted as found in front of them to repeal a law that they have never read)

I do this in the discussion on the reform of the LOCE, to make them see the deep deception media which are submitted and try them on.

"If there has been a substantial improvement in education in Chile, it is precisely because of the much maligned LOCE, but simply because of the laziness and ineptitude of the government."

To explain my view is that cite the Constitutional Organic Law of Education, the Ministry of Education Act, and the message of the General Law of Education (pending legislation). There are more rules, but I stop to summarize.

A Law is a law that is only called to make the principles and rules of general application, therefore is not the mission of a LO (Act) relate to specific topics.

LOCE: (Constitutional Organic Law of Education)
LO This sets the minimum requirements, this being their sole mission. States that education is a right of all people, the State must provide special protection for the exercise of it (right) and contribute to development and improvement of education.

The LOCE, throughout its text, echoes of the constitution, responding to the need to establish the regulatory framework on:
· entry and progress in the education system ,
· the minimum requirements for the existence of an adequate education
• How and who will deliver the education and
• the obligation to comply with its rules and other issued in this regard.

To comply with the foregoing, the LOCE given to the President, through the Ministry of Education, the obligation to meet these objectives. Adjuvant setting as well the role of the Higher Council of Education. Being

LOCE this the demon, I think that all the legends about his evil are totally unfounded. Titles III and IV did not see them since they still will not be repealed. What is no less important as the Higher Education Council is treated in such securities, whose principal role is to work with the Ministry for the quality of education and enforcement.

Therefore, we can arrive at the following conclusions in respect of:

· Quality Education : Minimum standards are dictated by management, as raising the level of education is within their powers expressed, not through the enactment of laws, but by decree of his ministry, so that in the absence of quality in education is that should be blamed first.
· Responsibility for breach: the duty to monitor is responsible to the Minister through their bodies, especially if compliance with the minimum margins set by them. In conclusion, the responsibility of the holder depends on the supervisory role of the state. It is unacceptable excuse.

This general law need to be drafted by others.

LME. (ministry of education law)
Defines the main role of the Ministry of Education mandated, among others:
· propose and evaluate policies and plans for educational and cultural development;
To study and propose general rules applicable to the sector and ensure compliance.

This law establishes a set of organisms, more and less centralized, so that the educational function is realized in a targeted fashion throughout the country, emphasizing in each, the importance quality of education and enforcement of it (including from the control teachers, to investment subsidies, etc.)..

Indeed, we can conclude from this law:

· Quality Education : The ministry, through its organs is required to ensure the overall quality of education. So if it has not been substantial progress in this area is that the Administration has engaged in misconduct to his ministerial duties.
· Responsibility for compliance: is charged at these same organs, express, monitoring and control contraventions of the law and regulations, having therefore the legal requirement to enforce the liability of the holder, when he has committed it.

Complementing both laws and recalling that omit others, it is possible to say that the administration already has tools to solve the problem objective and can conclude that the State has engaged in misconduct sustained throughout its chain of power. With the sole purpose, by the repeal of the LOCE, creating a smokescreen that allows media attention was distracted from these faults.

Repeal of LOCE: early education true and efficient?.
clearly not . The purpose of this is just remove all traces of military rule since, as has been diametrically established, the State now and has tools to solve urgent problems of education or is likely to become of them by decrees of the Ministry principalmente.Este purely political order is reflected in the broad message that accompanied the project - a verbiage of approximately twenty-four pages - to which I quote verbatim.

Understand the beginning of the project is difficult to point out that "The challenge of ensuring quality and give all Chileans, regardless of their socioeconomic status, the possibility of access to knowledge and culture, is a new task for the state and society " not what State is concerned whether from ancient Greece considered the importance of education. In fact, simplistic demagoguery.

then deleting the elbow, hand written with repeated principles rather than known. "So the first requirement to raise the overall quality of national education is to solve the serious problem of inequity, of arbitrary discrimination and targeting that are experienced within the system educational. "

Like all works of our Administration is also notable for its mediocrity. Indeed the much ballyhooed repeal, which results in the General Law of Education, take part: "In response to the recent formation of a Council for Higher Education (al) to complete the discussions and proposals that on this level education was not enough to deliver the Presidential Advisory Council is that they still exist as part of the new General Law of Education on higher education such provisions contained in the LOCE, which will be refurbished or replaced once request is received newly appointed Council " . is politically unacceptable, a purpose so emblematic of a government, expose so much laziness, being another example of the mockery of the people. Especially considering that in these credit control is important functions is that the new law, contributes little in the subject.

"After 17 years of education management of the Coalition Government in the country has known many and systematic efforts" For a moment I did not know if I read a message or a bill political discourse. Finally understood I read a pitiful political discourse, the only talk of effort and no results.

I feel rightly, about what we are facing a media explosion of insolence impresentable saying that "Unlike the law is amended by this act, this project is not an organic constitutional law" , and "At the same time, the project as a dimension of Education Act, explicitly and extends specific rights," in effect, to not be what you can "explain" and "expand" general rights. There being no further substantial contradiction between the LOCE and the new project if not expressly repealed, it will not happen, but in a few articles.

"has seen fit to incorporate the concept of new education goals. Thus, we propose that they are respecting human rights and fundamental freedoms, the exercise of tolerance, peace and respect for diversity. " fear these concepts so distorted and used for partisan purposes.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the improvement of education in Chile does not pass even by the accusations I do, since the lack of initiative, lack of expectations, lack of social contact, lack of motivation on the culture, etc, etc, is widespread across the board in Chile, so come in this country mainly depends on personal merit, being therefore, necessary to distinguish the outstanding student, which is not to give him more opportunities. On the other hand it is impossible to require the teaching quality in economic conditions in which it is. If there are quality, and of course many are, again, is by personal merit.

profits in the LOCE: aberration?
Sectors ideologically close to the Administration and several uninformed qualify as something abhorrent to profit if you get education according to the Fiscal contribution. But set a similar principle so strictly is aberrant.

estimate that it is immoral to profit from public funds, would necessarily end up with the salaries of all public officials, centralized or not, in any degree (of the President to the last). This thought is nothing more than narrow and ideological struggle advocates.
Now, if you do not respect the work honored, I guess the generality of the supporters, it means that we would be expropriating their work the inability of the supervisory role and pro - active state. If you seek to profit by their education, why not also the right holder?. Now, if by the oversight role of the state, we found situations that do not meet acceptable standards, is the job of ending it and punish them to the holder.

It is reasonable to conclude from this that the problems of national education defendants have been produced largely by the failures that have had recent administrations in meeting their obligations. Repeat the accused to the object and not the hand that employs him, which the State should not be allowed, for we citizens.

The Preacher.

* if you are interested the full text with relevant articles, solicitenlo by mail.

Walking With The Devil Sayings

citizen, part I

I have to wake up from this slumber. Since the last time I communicated with you have been so many fiascos in all sorts of things: Transantiago LOCE, Pass School, in anticipation, the new "quota" of parliament, etc, etc. . . Unfortunately

Chile is full of these embarrassing cases in which all participants or arguments argue bordering on stupidity or turn into the same hesitations as usual or do nothing or to combine perfectly the last three alternatives, and I am so upset that he would prefer to forget everything and live this hard time, but my conscience obliges me to this to squeeze out of my mind these words:

Lizama start with the case (it's reported comment of "Mercury")

· "I never knew I was the judge," said TVN last night, the young Jorge Lizama, 19, who must meet detention during the processing by the attack on Judge Gloria Ana Chevesich during the protest last March 29, departing the day the young "criminal."
With all the respect I have for the Minister Chevesich, I am concerned that justice work with this quickly when we see "important" people involved.

· Lizama said he was "extremely sorry" for the attack on Chevesich
And of course this puppet should be sorry, because it is quite clear that I was involved with the wrong person, and expensive it will cost.

· "I do not think that should fall to jail, that's the worst that can happen to a person. People come out worse, then do not think I serve much jail "
Unfortunately we are facing an endemic of Chileans as pilgrims astonishingly, to your surprise, there are all sorts of crimes that fall outside the collective consciousness, as buying in the street, not paying micro, keep the back, etc etc. All made by these famous "Protestant" is a crime, well deserve to go jail and compensate all the damages caused. In this sense, the prison, outside the modern concept that has play a role in rehabilitation, is a punishment, a regret, to restrain the offender.

· claims to be "libertarian, not anarchist," admitted taking part in the march La Moneda on September 10, 2006, but denied throwing a Molotov cocktail into the palace. Yes admitted stoned a fast-food restaurant in Alameda. "No, I'ma libertarian, I am not an anarchist. If it were not to be living here, would be self-managing my life." Front
dear pilgrims to these statements I feel overwhelmed, because they made against the libertarian anarchism, at least it should lead to respect the intelligence of the aforementioned and presumably has some idea of \u200b\u200bwhat he speaks. But thankfully I avoided this waste neuronal and he responds to my concerns.
This is a great example of the widespread ignorance of all these groups or tribes, as some call them. In truth is beyond my present purpose to expose the false concept of the sentence declared, but they only tell you all: anarchists!, If they manage their lives. Does this seem logical?.

• The youngest refused to be a symbol of youth violence. "I'm not, I'm being persecuted simply a chase, someone has to fall right down and I fell."
is intended or not a symbol of youth violence, it is clear that these behaviors create awareness impact on tort, generating more and more puppets in the service of the winds that stir the waters, known ideologically but masked.
On the other hand, I think our "friend" has serious delusions of persecution should see a specialist because I do not see where the authority will pursue these demonstrations. My watchful eyes, my ears are trained only standing. For centuries, pilgrims dear, it is known that the rule of law, one does not push him or below, or well below, or anything. The prior conduct is established, and therefore self is who it is imposed.

• The reason that hooding is: "Because in this system if they see you face, if you know who you are, they put you in jail. The only option is to leave hooded, not see you face. It is not cowardice, it is courage. "
This is another phrase for the gold. And unfortunately calls himself a libertarian, then live the freedom of their faces covered, freedom of reactionary violence. It gives me a fuzzy feeling between laughs and fear. The only thing I say damn cowards, is give the face!, male night, male anyday. If you are brave acts will be around, and if the consequences are bad Resist him stoically. Unfortunately in my eyes you are nothing but criminals, uneducated, violent and cowardly - bad mix .-

• Which can be achieved without actuai with violence, whether in a march peacefully actuai no you'll catch. "
Well clearly things can be achieved peacefully. But do not be fooled, since their purposes are different from those published, just apparently masked protests.

° to the damage noted: "Those who are a local shred Flaites not know anything about what they are doing, destroy local poor people. What it is justifiable, perhaps, is to break a bank, a multinational. "
Is there any substantial difference between destroying private property of humble people and great companies?, Being any causal link between two parts. active or aggressor in this case is the one who throws the stone, who destroys, who burn, the passive victim is his own destruction.
How important is perhaps if the purchasing power of A or B is different so it is easier to solve the situation?. In the morality of active is indistinct, since the fact is the same.
is only a sample of old separatist doctrines totally wrong, which promote hatred between classes.

· "Obviously yes, if I'll be in jail with criminals almost." "I'm not criminal, I'm not, the offender is violating the people involved, people that walk robbing their own people" .
Offenders are those who commit crimes, and as I said and I noted, it is criminal to Chile's only violates kills, "steals from his own people", etc, etc ... Well let me tell you contradict and in letters: CRIMINALS! ! ! !

° to the lack of his mother in his training, said he had suffered when she was ...
Without justifying the wrongful conduct is a big test because we must protect the family, an activity much vilified by the current administration.

• The Lizama remand was ordered by the Third Chamber of the Court of Appeals capital city ... Sample
the first instance it is currently suffering serious conceptual conflict on how to apply the criminal law. Due to various factors I think that involves all actors in national politics. Parliamentarians as always do not represent a real contribution, the executive unfortunate policies, justice without the means (physical and intellectual), the most appropriate institutions and prisons needed.
And you know, could go on all morning.

· "the accused, after being intercepted the car of the Minister in Paraguay with Lira Diagonal Street, and warned that it was a high government official ...
To me, again, I care that the Minister has tried and is more, I concerned, and I insist, with all the respect she deserves.
Because if it had been the order of Don Juan, Dona Maria, ordinary people or the business of Don Fulano, the shoe store or whatever Perengano of Sutan, as occurred in 99.9% of other impairments The answer, punishing criminals guilty, never came. Justice addressed, dear pilgrims, is bad for legal certainty.

· Andrés Rieutord, claimed that the youth was not acting in concert, he did not know it was the minister, and you can not detain a person "to satisfy public opinion."
Shame give according to his lawyer argued his pocket and spitting on true justice, citing as stupid and illogical.
And I venture to answer: of course public opinion in a democracy is important, or is it not their livelihood. The public must be satisfied when based on history as much weight as those that occurred, but it is not permissible to feel neglected and reveal. Les

neglect to ponder my words.
The Preacher.

give them the link to emol