Tuesday, May 1, 2007

City Of Calgary Car Auction

"Negligence Aysén?

Dear, come in to tell a dream I had

Aysén "Negligence?
is understood as a lack of prudence due to the specific case, which, in tort should be all that it avoids the production of a damaging event.

The work of diligence by the State mainly due to the order contained in Article 1 of the Constitution, which is that state serves the individual and its purpose is to promote the common good, which related to other provisions will further instructs that his actions have to be: Legitimate
· , ie fulfilling with laws and regulations.
· not arbitrary, respecting people, avoiding unfair discrimination. Responsible
· , making this the responsibility of the staff when it incurs. Caused
· , ie the principle of legitimacy can only act in the law, not discretion.

All this, within the framework of what happened in Aysen, lead to investigate the possible liability that the state has to do this on their staff, through their own oversight role, subject to legal action if they are appropriate.
Indeed, to achieve our result is that we must distinguish between:

· Political Responsibility: The ultimate effect of this responsibility is to the discredit falls on the officer, by virtue of their ill-advised work, which pursues the term of office

· Criminal Liability: When the act committed by the staff is so reprehensible it is possible to configure the typical causal forces the judiciary to become a party to remedy the shattered order seeking the conviction involved .

· Liability: Drifting in the case of economic losses suffered for the victims and the moral as they come, in fact, what is presented as necessary to determine if a public official seriously missing its obligations to respond civilly.

Aysén The case is particularly special, since in theory respond to a fortuitous event, which is a contingency which is impossible to resist. Necessary to present the BREAKDOWN of the term based on what happened.

· Unexpected: Indeed the occurrence of an act of nature most cases be a fortuitous event, is the fact that Chile is a seismic country, even to qualify an earthquake of a fortuitous event.
But the facts of the case give us a valuable data, which is that the area was a condition of geological hazard, due to the constant pursuit of earthquakes since January, which according to experts, unlike the government's official version (if it exists in some cases), indicating the early occurrence of any event of connotation as landslides and possible tsunami from an earthquake under consideration. Of course, by its very nature random, only the level of a possibility. Notwithstanding the above we can draw the following conclusions:

§ The defense of Chile is a country that does not originate in seismic the species, since we were dealing with a complex picture of seismic activity that experts had been predicted based on their experience and scientific studies. §
geomechanics The condition of the rocks of the fjord is an element known to experts, to which can not be maintained any unforeseeable circumstances, concluding that there must have been a contingency plan.
§ And most importantly, human life is the most precious treasure you have to take care of the state. Indeed at the mere possibility that an event came to fruition so damaging is that should mobilize all its equipment to prevent what happened.

· Unable to withstand the consequences : Closely related to this is that under the seismic condition present and the local geomechanics have been completely avoidable harmful consequences if we had an a priori contingency plan that at least in theory have identified the risks patent and given measures (which is something, compared to nothing). Unfortunately the condition of insecurity, experts say, as the head of seismology at the University of Chile, Carlos Aranda, who also attended and experienced the tragedy, is maintained and sustained, with the words reading "we speak colloquially of an earthquake, when there is a more widespread disaster, "so From my point of view can be brought back terrible consequences attention to neglected work of our Administration.

In this species, the unfortunate deaths are imputable to the State, so it is necessary to establish the alleged perpetrators.

The main authority responsible for administering the country is the President of the Republic, whose mission delegates functions in the bodies created by law for specific tasks.
In view of this is that we have at first glance the following suspects:
• The President and the Mayor to be his face visible in the area and may also appropriate governance.
· The National Emergency Office

Why?, because these bodies are endowed with the power to issue technical standards on the subject, abandoned work based on the evidence of public knowledge, supplied by the victims themselves, as omission resulted in the death and disappearance of people, act defined as a quasi-homicide at first glance, to be a fact that caused the death convicted, but I dare to go further.
In criminal law the conduct constituting the offense do not necessarily have to be active, but also negligent. The requirement itself, which must exist to categorize the behavior straight crime is the presence of fraud, which can occur in several ways:
· Dolo Direct Grade 1 : The positive intention of inferring loss or damage on the person or property of another, which in homicide is the murderous intent. Example: If I kill X developing a plan and then the concrete. Dolo
· Direct Grade 2: Consists of the predictability of the harmful effects of the act, assuming them to be true and acting anyway.
Example: but if X, 'believing themselves to save the innocent "fly in a planeload of passengers and my medium is by detonating A grenade was also clearly the passengers die, if I accept it and detonated the device they concur on this fraud.
· Dolo Eventual: Consists of the predictability of the harmful effects of the act, and act to accept the possible occurrence anyway.
Example: If X, "the unfortunate", has to travel with me and I get drunk, aware of the possibility of having a fatal accident occurs incur in this fraud.

In short, I do not have any evidence or argument to accuse the administration of direct malice, however is entirely possible the assessment of potential fraud, as in the species:
area risk was known and its residents had requested assistance.
In the hypothetical occurrence made the fatal outcome was certain, just by chance.
The "Out of Service" is a remarkable neglect of duties, especially experienced authorities on the subject that could not fail to be aware of what happened
claim to have sent information (constituting confession, although no test against, certifies that the condition was known)

In summary the requirements are set to establish that there was possible fraud, an offense of murder by the authorities in breach of their duties. (Other is that by to steal money embezzlement by its omissions "steal" lives), which I think exceeds the characteristics of a typical negligence, being clearly more serious.
Under the principle that penalties are personal our office is saved from my criminal charges, but not administrative, especially by failing to order the political responsibility of other staff. Finally

must repair any damage that is attributable to malice or negligence, being from tort compensation for all financial and moral damage caused to the victims. This is thanks to the theory of body, whereby economically accountable to the victims not the author, but from whom he depended, for the Treasury (without prejudice to any action that it exercises over those responsible).

hope that another tragedy is not at all. (I have the impression that I hope in vain).

suddenly woke up and felt very relieved that the above never happen in Chile.

The Preacher.

No Cd For Mount And Blade

Don `t take the blue pill! Nn

Morpheus (taking two tablets): If you take the blue pill, the story ends, you wake up in bed and you believe whatever you want to believe. If you take the red pill you stay in the world of wonders, and show you how deep the rabbit hole is ... Remember, all I'm offering is the truth, nothing more ....


"We are being affected by a subtle conditioning, stone and stealthy"

is frustrating for me to notice the decay of the values \u200b\u200bwe share, so staggering and almost unstoppable.

Minister Lagos Weber said in an interview with La Tercera occurred in most of my dislikes, the purpose stated:

"I think it's great that some believe they dissociated themselves from certain views. I note that there multiple opportunities in Parliament and in national politics so that those who point to his league of certain roles and characterizations, give example of that, "... "Laws in the future and political aspects of Chilean society" ... .



It is mainly because they do not share the values \u200b\u200bof the left, and minus the pathetic job they have done throughout his term. Awesome

I think the use of language, so sharp between a few lines, as measured, reflecting a highly successful conditioning.

To explain the complexity that I see so clearly, I will breakdown more didactic than substantive way to facilitate understanding. Clear

visions of : This is the phrase that gives me more rejection in the statement. Indeed, it is obvious intention of the whole conglomerate of government, very clear in their purpose, to discredit all aspects of dissenting views in terms of value and cost. Unfortunately the problem is not only a threat, but actually, who must represent a firewall stabilizer to the opposite view, with merely neglect to discredit themselves and ultimately accomplish nothing.
The consequence of this is that much of the population is deleted in its freedom of expression and hands tied by imposed by force (in) moral trend that everything comes from liberalism "goal" is an aberration. Liber

Alisma
Left
self-attributes is subjective liberalism, attributing the advances that have led to social demands.



Right

aim is attributed liberalism, under which only is limited to economic

conceptual What really is just a big hoax.


Of course, today's society and the experience of the excesses that occurred on the occasion of pure liberalism, have been limited due to the Common Good
Liberalism in Chile is an important manifestation of the principle of subsidiarity, which reflects that the state gives corporate action on behalf of individuals. In the accompanying immediate major benefit, namely that the state is not linked to concerns, to focus mainly on social or welfare connotation.
Nonetheless, recent history has not shown us the development of liberalism in the subjective, but only a simpleton debauchery, as opposed the great progress made in the past, social security, to name something.


consequence of this, is to maintain the inequalities that give life to the scheme meeting and have sunk to the middle class in a situation of instability and unbearable anguish through ideological class struggle creates waiting reconciliations of paper on which the benefit is more media than substantive.


Roles: democracy is essential to the existence of different roles, ie, if there is opposition within society does not justify the democratic administration. So when the Minister his words echoing across the ideological thinking that accompanies it, shows its conformity to leave only demonstrates roles is their totalitarian vision. Philosophically
and contrary to what appears at first sight is sustainable as just mentioned. In fact, very different from that used artificial mask concluding (cluster pro - people, vindicating rights, equality and socialized in any populist slogan) is the true role that government, which is limited only to go blunder after blunder (repeat, deliberately) to maintain conditions that are favorable. But thus appear to the public, irremediablemente aparejaría su destrucción, por lo que debe excusarse en eventos casi fortuitos o responsabilizar a sus opositores o bien eliminar el miembro prescindible. Por tanto mediante este mecanismo siniestro es que se perpetúa en el poder, lo que es una veta bastante tortuosa del totalitarismo sin lugar a dudas.


Caracterizaciones: Quien no te conozca que te compre reza un dicho. Claramente la alusión al término “caracterización” está tomado desde un punto de vista peyorativo, es decir, a la postura ficticia, a la puesta en escena para obtener provechos políticos. Este punto, si en parte lo comparto, puesto que la derecha no obstante shared economic vision of liberalism, having brought to Chile the social market system, my impression is that it has maintained a more awkward than blind support for entrepreneurship, since it has not effectively fought the great inequalities that has occurred purely commercial vision that pledged example the pension system. What I can not share is that he is accused of maintaining a characterization, in specific cases where he is right, without sharing the "vision" of the government (view course leads to the darkest of nights, echoing the words of the President).

Clearly we are being destroyed by the totalitarian vision of politics. View all healthy, it needs to sustain inequalities and that therefore the propitious covertly, to train teachers, creating social conflict.



Our only way out is to fight for our rights, loudly, by Pro Active Revolution, that is, by the prosecution accurate, the replica energetic and lack of fear to enforce our cause, and actually try to slag us, but if we are clear values, you get to step in and political responsibility as thirsty demand, being entitled to it and the reasons have more than enough ie, only to trample our values \u200b\u200band make us look like what is out of place, even before our own eyes.

"The key is not to fight but to fight for (our freedom)."

The Preacher.