( Dedicated to students who have destroyed and looted as found in front of them to repeal a law that they have never read)
I do this in the discussion on the reform of the LOCE, to make them see the deep deception media which are submitted and try them on.
"If there has been a substantial improvement in education in Chile, it is precisely because of the much maligned LOCE, but simply because of the laziness and ineptitude of the government."
To explain my view is that cite the Constitutional Organic Law of Education, the Ministry of Education Act, and the message of the General Law of Education (pending legislation). There are more rules, but I stop to summarize.
A Law is a law that is only called to make the principles and rules of general application, therefore is not the mission of a LO (Act) relate to specific topics.
LOCE: (Constitutional Organic Law of Education)
LO This sets the minimum requirements, this being their sole mission. States that education is a right of all people, the State must provide special protection for the exercise of it (right) and contribute to development and improvement of education.
The LOCE, throughout its text, echoes of the constitution, responding to the need to establish the regulatory framework on:
· entry and progress in the education system ,
· the minimum requirements for the existence of an adequate education
• How and who will deliver the education and
• the obligation to comply with its rules and other issued in this regard.
LOCE this the demon, I think that all the legends about his evil are totally unfounded. Titles III and IV did not see them since they still will not be repealed. What is no less important as the Higher Education Council is treated in such securities, whose principal role is to work with the Ministry for the quality of education and enforcement.
Therefore, we can arrive at the following conclusions in respect of:
· Quality Education : Minimum standards are dictated by management, as raising the level of education is within their powers expressed, not through the enactment of laws, but by decree of his ministry, so that in the absence of quality in education is that should be blamed first.
· Responsibility for breach: the duty to monitor is responsible to the Minister through their bodies, especially if compliance with the minimum margins set by them. In conclusion, the responsibility of the holder depends on the supervisory role of the state. It is unacceptable excuse.
This general law need to be drafted by others.
LME. (ministry of education law)
Defines the main role of the Ministry of Education mandated, among others:
· propose and evaluate policies and plans for educational and cultural development;
To study and propose general rules applicable to the sector and ensure compliance.
Indeed, we can conclude from this law:
· Quality Education : The ministry, through its organs is required to ensure the overall quality of education. So if it has not been substantial progress in this area is that the Administration has engaged in misconduct to his ministerial duties.
· Responsibility for compliance: is charged at these same organs, express, monitoring and control contraventions of the law and regulations, having therefore the legal requirement to enforce the liability of the holder, when he has committed it.
Complementing both laws and recalling that omit others, it is possible to say that the administration already has tools to solve the problem objective and can conclude that the State has engaged in misconduct sustained throughout its chain of power. With the sole purpose, by the repeal of the LOCE, creating a smokescreen that allows media attention was distracted from these faults.
Repeal of LOCE: early education true and efficient?. clearly not . The purpose of this is just remove all traces of military rule since, as has been diametrically established, the State now and has tools to solve urgent problems of education or is likely to become of them by decrees of the Ministry principalmente.Este purely political order is reflected in the broad message that accompanied the project - a verbiage of approximately twenty-four pages - to which I quote verbatim.
Understand the beginning of the project is difficult to point out that "The challenge of ensuring quality and give all Chileans, regardless of their socioeconomic status, the possibility of access to knowledge and culture, is a new task for the state and society " not what State is concerned whether from ancient Greece considered the importance of education. In fact, simplistic demagoguery.
then deleting the elbow, hand written with repeated principles rather than known. "So the first requirement to raise the overall quality of national education is to solve the serious problem of inequity, of arbitrary discrimination and targeting that are experienced within the system educational. "
Like all works of our Administration is also notable for its mediocrity. Indeed the much ballyhooed repeal, which results in the General Law of Education, take part: "In response to the recent formation of a Council for Higher Education (al) to complete the discussions and proposals that on this level education was not enough to deliver the Presidential Advisory Council is that they still exist as part of the new General Law of Education on higher education such provisions contained in the LOCE, which will be refurbished or replaced once request is received newly appointed Council " . is politically unacceptable, a purpose so emblematic of a government, expose so much laziness, being another example of the mockery of the people. Especially considering that in these credit control is important functions is that the new law, contributes little in the subject.
"After 17 years of education management of the Coalition Government in the country has known many and systematic efforts" For a moment I did not know if I read a message or a bill political discourse. Finally understood I read a pitiful political discourse, the only talk of effort and no results.
I feel rightly, about what we are facing a media explosion of insolence impresentable saying that "Unlike the law is amended by this act, this project is not an organic constitutional law" , and "At the same time, the project as a dimension of Education Act, explicitly and extends specific rights," in effect, to not be what you can "explain" and "expand" general rights. There being no further substantial contradiction between the LOCE and the new project if not expressly repealed, it will not happen, but in a few articles.
"has seen fit to incorporate the concept of new education goals. Thus, we propose that they are respecting human rights and fundamental freedoms, the exercise of tolerance, peace and respect for diversity. " fear these concepts so distorted and used for partisan purposes.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the improvement of education in Chile does not pass even by the accusations I do, since the lack of initiative, lack of expectations, lack of social contact, lack of motivation on the culture, etc, etc, is widespread across the board in Chile, so come in this country mainly depends on personal merit, being therefore, necessary to distinguish the outstanding student, which is not to give him more opportunities. On the other hand it is impossible to require the teaching quality in economic conditions in which it is. If there are quality, and of course many are, again, is by personal merit.
profits in the LOCE: aberration?
Sectors ideologically close to the Administration and several uninformed qualify as something abhorrent to profit if you get education according to the Fiscal contribution. But set a similar principle so strictly is aberrant.
estimate that it is immoral to profit from public funds, would necessarily end up with the salaries of all public officials, centralized or not, in any degree (of the President to the last). This thought is nothing more than narrow and ideological struggle advocates.
Now, if you do not respect the work honored, I guess the generality of the supporters, it means that we would be expropriating their work the inability of the supervisory role and pro - active state. If you seek to profit by their education, why not also the right holder?. Now, if by the oversight role of the state, we found situations that do not meet acceptable standards, is the job of ending it and punish them to the holder.
Now, if you do not respect the work honored, I guess the generality of the supporters, it means that we would be expropriating their work the inability of the supervisory role and pro - active state. If you seek to profit by their education, why not also the right holder?. Now, if by the oversight role of the state, we found situations that do not meet acceptable standards, is the job of ending it and punish them to the holder.
It is reasonable to conclude from this that the problems of national education defendants have been produced largely by the failures that have had recent administrations in meeting their obligations. Repeat the accused to the object and not the hand that employs him, which the State should not be allowed, for we citizens.
The Preacher.
* if you are interested the full text with relevant articles, solicitenlo by mail.
0 comments:
Post a Comment